This will be just one of many reviews as we work our way through the Alfred Hitchcock's movie's. Today's installment is "Murder" (1930).
In this film, a murder has been committed. A woman is a shoe-in for "the smoking gun". By all accounts, she did it.
The film takes us through the discovery of the murder, the police investigation, the trial, and spends some time in the jury room. Later a juror is not comfortable with his decision and sets out to find the truth.
Dated as to gender roles, and melodramatic in the way of its era, it is still quite an interesting film. We streamed it live from Netflix. The sound is challenging at times and I missed quite a bit of dialogue. Still a worthy watch.
Black and white and not rated. Most kids would be bored.
I was not able to find any trailers for the film. You CAN watch the entire thing on YouTube so I'll put that link here, or watch below if you wish.
I give opinions on all sort of random stuff EXCEPT religion and politics...two of the most divisive topics on the planet. I give advice and answer questions (like an advice column), and I love the topics of all things spiritual and metaphysical, parenting and general life issues. I'll review products, movies, books, you name it. Enter your email address in the blank below and click submit to subscribe to my new posts via email.
Sunday, January 20, 2013
Movie Review: Alfred Hitchcock's Murder (1930)
Labels:
1930,
Alfred Hitchcock,
movie review,
Murder
| Reactions: |
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

I adore old movies. (And 1930 would certainly qualify!). I wonder what year they began releasing talking movies (I should google). How did it compare to modern day murder mystery movies?
ReplyDeleteapparently the first feature talking film released was in 1927...The Jazz Singer. 1923 was the first short films being made with sound. By 1930...they were all the rage.
ReplyDeleteI think in comparison, the murder mystery was slower-paced with a lot more melodrama and fake fighting/swooning/fainting that really makes you laugh. Less violence overall, nothing of a graphic nature, although in many of A.H. films there is some sexual suggestiveness that would have been very risque for the time. In this film, there is a couple having an extramarital affair. Now I'm stoked to eventually watch them all and see how many I can find A.H. appearing in the crowd in brief cameo appearances. It's sort of like Where's Waldo. Often he's making a silly face or walking in a weird bouncy way.